Ranking
Ranked by food score, then Worth Score, considering range, local identity, everyday accessibility, and tourist-area risk. Ties break by Worth Score, then city name.
- 1Tokyo98/100 · Exceptional, Needs Discipline
- 2Hanoi97/100 · Atmospheric Value
- 3Lima97/100 · Food-First Gateway
- 4Taipei96/100 · Food, Ease, Value
- 5New Orleans96/100 · Atmospheric, High-Friction
- 6Chicago94/100 · Big-City Value
- 7Istanbul94/100 · World-Class, High Friction
- 8Mumbai94/100 · Energetic, Coastal, Demanding
- 9Madrid92/100 · Food, Museums, Local Rhythm
- 10Tbilisi92/100 · Atmospheric Value
- 11Toronto92/100 · Food and Neighborhoods
- 12Shanghai92/100 · Modern China Gateway
- 13Tel Aviv92/100 · Beach Energy, Premium Prices
- 14Delhi92/100 · Huge Payoff, High Friction
- 15Los Angeles92/100 · Iconic, Spread Out
- 16Hoi An90/100 · Small, Beautiful, Popular
- 17Copenhagen90/100 · Comfortable, Stylish, Expensive
- 18Brussels90/100 · Useful, Food-Forward Capital
- 19London90/100 · Huge Payoff, High Cost
- 20Marseille90/100 · Characterful, Uneven, Coastal